The ground we stand on — life circumstances that shape capacity for change
Welcome to the Terraforms Clinical Intake. This structured assessment gathers comprehensive nervous system and life history data across 20 domains. Gold-bordered sections throughout contain practitioner guidance — expand them to reveal interview prompts, clinical observations, modality-specific notes, and red flags.
Your role is to facilitate disclosure, not to interpret or treat. Create safety through presence. The client's nervous system will reveal what it's ready to share when it trusts the container you provide.
Section 2 contains ASQ-adapted suicide screening. Section 4 contains DES-B adapted dissociation screening. If either reveals acute risk, pause the intake and follow your organization's crisis protocol. This assessment is not a substitute for emergency intervention.
Let us know who you are and where you find yourself in life right now.
This section maps the client's external circumstances — the container in which their healing will occur. Age indicates developmental stage and potential generational trauma patterns. Living situation reveals support availability and privacy for practice. Work status shows stress load and schedule flexibility.
Isolation + high stress work. Institutional settings limiting autonomy. No one aware they're seeking help. Caregiving role with no reciprocal support. Living with active abuser or in unsafe housing.
Cross-reference: Section 7 (Environment) for physical space constraints, Section 14 (Relationships) for support quality.
Tell me a little about your life right now — just the shape of a typical day.— opens without pressure
What brought you here today, in your own words?— reveals self-narrative
Is there anyone in your life who knows you're doing this?— maps support network
Note arrival: early/on-time/late. Observe how they enter the space — hesitant, scanning, relaxed. Watch for fidgeting, self-soothing gestures. Notice if they orient toward exits.
Note background sounds — are they alone? Private space? Listen for breathing patterns, long pauses, sounds of movement. On video: lighting, camera angle, visible environment.
The symptoms and diagnoses that brought them to seek help
You may have a diagnosis. You may simply know that something is wrong. You may have been told nothing is wrong when everything feels wrong. All of these are valid. Name what you carry.
This reveals the client's presenting concerns and their relationship with the medical system. Multiple overlapping conditions (CPTSD + ME/CFS + anxiety) often indicate deep nervous system dysregulation. The duration question reveals chronicity — years of suffering suggest entrenched patterns but also resilience. The "losses" question is critical: it shows what the condition has cost them and what they're fighting to reclaim. Key pattern: Clients who've lost "sense of who I am" need identity work alongside somatic practice.
When did you first know something was wrong — not when you got diagnosed, but when you knew?— separates lived experience from labels
What has this cost you? What have you had to let go of?— reveals grief and stakes
If everything changed tomorrow, what would you do first?— reveals core desires beneath symptoms
Has anyone believed you? Has anyone not believed you?— reveals medical trauma and validation history
Watch for body-based symptoms appearing as they describe (rubbing temples, hand to chest, shifting). Note if they bring medical records or documentation — suggests need for external validation.
Listen for rehearsed quality — have they told this story many times? Note pauses before clinical terms. Watch for screen-reading if on video (may have notes or be checking accuracy).
In the past two weeks, have you had thoughts of hurting yourself or that you'd be better off dead?
Have you ever made a suicide attempt?
Do you currently have access to means of self-harm (weapons, stockpiled medications, etc.)?
This is the ASQ (Ask Suicide-Screening Questions) adapted screening. Any positive response requires follow-up. "Frequent thoughts" or "plan" = do not proceed without safety planning conversation. Recent attempt + current means access = crisis intervention required before intake continues. Document your clinical reasoning explicitly in your notes.
1. Do not leave client alone. 2. Ask directly: "Are you thinking of killing yourself?" 3. If yes + plan + means: Contact crisis services immediately. 4. If passing thoughts only: Create safety plan, identify reasons for living, establish check-in protocol. 5. Document everything including your clinical decision-making process.
Where sensation lives and what the body is trying to communicate
The body keeps the score. It carries what the mind cannot process, holds what was never safe to feel. These questions help us understand where your body has been waiting for you.
Tension patterns reveal trauma storage locations and protective bracing. Jaw = unexpressed rage/grief. Gut = preverbal trauma. Pelvic floor = sexual trauma or boundary violation. Low energy + poor sleep = HPA axis dysregulation. The "body as enemy" response indicates severe dissociation — these clients need slower, gentler protocol entry. Watch for those who "can't feel" certain areas — this numbness is protective and shouldn't be pushed. Protocol implications: Floor work accessibility, need for cold/heat modifications, stillness tolerance.
If you drop your attention into your body right now, what do you notice first?— reveals interoceptive access
Is there a part of your body you don't like to think about or feel into?— locates dissociation or trauma
When you're stressed, where does your body tell you first?— identifies signal sites
Has your body ever felt safe? When was that?— reveals baseline and possibility of safety
Observe overall posture, asymmetries, collapsed vs braced positions. Notice if they touch body parts as they mention them. Watch breathing pattern throughout — does it change with topics?
Ask: "Take a moment to scan your body — what do you notice?" Give silence. On video, watch for dissociation cues: gaze drifting up-left, eyes unfocusing. Note audible sighs or breath changes.
The polyvagal map — fight, flight, freeze, and fawn responses
Your nervous system learned to protect you. It is still running programmes written for dangers that may no longer exist. These questions help us understand the shape of your survival.
This is the diagnostic core — it reveals the client's polyvagal state and survival pattern. Low regulation (1-3) + high vigilance + frequent freeze = dorsal vagal dominance requiring Phase 1 emphasis. "Never safe" indicates developmental trauma requiring longer trust-building. Boundary oscillation (both/neither) is classic CPTSD pattern. The "inner voice" question reveals internal attachment style — critical inner voice often mirrors childhood caregiver. Shame prevalence predicts resistance to self-compassion practices.
High dissociation + absent inner critic may indicate structural dissociation — proceed with care. "Never safe" + freeze dominant = complex trauma requiring specialist consultation. Regulation at 1-2 with current life stressors = stabilization before deeper work. Shame + isolation + perfectionism = suicide risk factor constellation.
Cross-reference: Section 5 (History) for trauma origins, Section 16 (Defense Patterns) for protective strategies, Section 13 (Emotional Landscape) for affect regulation capacity.
When you feel threatened, what happens in your body before your mind catches up?— maps autonomic sequence
Do you tend to move toward people, against people, away from people, or shut down completely?— Hornevian style
What's the fastest way for you to feel unsafe? What triggers it reliably?— identifies activation triggers
When you're overwhelmed, do you speed up or shut down?— sympathetic vs dorsal
Your own nervous system is a diagnostic instrument. Notice if you feel activated, sleepy, or pulled to rescue. Track color changes in face/neck. Note pupil dilation shifts.
Voice is your primary instrument. Listen for vocal fry (shutdown), pressed voice (activation), or sudden flatness. Long pauses may indicate freeze or dissociation — name it gently.
Finding yourself somewhere with no memory of how you got there
Feeling like you are watching yourself from outside your body
Feeling like the world around you is unreal, like a dream or behind glass
Not recognizing yourself in the mirror
Hearing voices inside your head (distinct from your own thoughts)
These items are adapted from the Dissociative Experiences Scale Brief (DES-B). "Often" responses to multiple items = elevated dissociation requiring slower pacing and enhanced stabilization. "Often" on amnesia + voices = consider SCID-D referral for possible dissociative disorder. High dissociation contraindicates rapid trauma processing.
DES score proxy: Never=0, Rarely=10, Sometimes=30, Often=60. Average across items. Score 30+ = clinically significant dissociation. Score 45+ = high likelihood of dissociative disorder. If elevated: Prioritize grounding skills, resource installation, and containment before any trauma work. Never use EMDR or exposure therapy without adequate stabilization and dissociation management skills in place.
Developmental wounds and attachment patterns formed in early life
We do not need the details of what happened. The body already knows. We need only the shape of it — enough to understand what your nervous system learned about the world, and what it may need to unlearn.
This maps the origin of current patterns. Childhood environment + caregiver type = attachment style prediction. "Unpredictable" environments create hypervigilance; "emotionally absent" caregivers create anxious attachment seeking. Previous healing work shows what they've tried — failures here inform what NOT to repeat. Pay special attention to "what has hurt" — it reveals therapeutic ruptures and iatrogenic harm that must be avoided. Those who've done "lots of therapy" but remain stuck often need body-first approaches — the talking has been exhausted without somatic resolution.
ACE score 4+ indicates significantly elevated health and mental health risks. "Unsafe" childhood + critical/controlling caregiver = disorganized attachment requiring careful pacing. Multiple failed therapies may indicate complex trauma, personality factors, or therapist mismatch — explore thoroughly. "Can't remember" childhood before age 10-12 may indicate dissociative amnesia.
Cross-reference: Section 4 (Nervous System) for current regulation capacity, Section 14 (Relationships) for adult attachment patterns, Section 15 (Core Beliefs) for schema formed in childhood.
What's your earliest memory?— reveals age of accessible memory and tone
What would a typical dinnertime have been like in your home?— concrete scene reveals family dynamics
Who were you in your family? What was your role?— identifies parentification, scapegoat, golden child
Was there anyone outside your family who was important to you?— protective factors
What did you do with big feelings as a child?— early coping strategies
Have grounding resources ready — feet on floor, object to hold. Watch for age regression in posture. If flooding occurs, offer orienting: "Can you feel your feet? Look around the room."
Prepare client beforehand: "Have something comforting nearby." Use vocal grounding: "Take a breath with me." Watch for sudden silence — may need to check in: "Where did you go just now?"
Circadian rhythms, sleep architecture, and lifestyle patterns
How you live shapes how you heal. These questions help us design practices that fit your actual life, not an imaginary one.
This maps the raw material of daily life — where practices must be inserted. Sleep timing reveals circadian disruption (late sleep = cortisol dysregulation). Food relationship often mirrors emotional patterns: restriction = control seeking, comfort eating = emotional numbing. Substance use indicates current coping strategies that practices will need to replace. Screen time + low nature exposure = dopamine dysregulation. Protocol design: Match practice recommendations to actual wake/sleep times, not ideal ones. High screen + low nature = prioritize Sun teacher and outdoor grounding.
Walk me through yesterday — from when you woke up to when you went to sleep.— reveals actual vs reported habits
What's your relationship with food like right now?— opens without judgment
What do you reach for when you need to feel better quickly?— reveals coping hierarchy
When was the last time you felt genuinely rested?— reveals sleep debt
Observe signs of sleep deprivation (dark circles, yawning). Note caffeine consumption if visible. Watch for physical signs of nutrition: skin, hair, energy levels.
Note time of session vs their rhythm. Evening session + exhausted voice = chronic depletion. On video, note environment: lights on during day? Clutter? Food/drink visible?
Physical space, support systems, and practical constraints
Your environment shapes what is possible. Understanding your constraints helps us design a protocol that works in your actual space.
This determines practical protocol feasibility. Each constraint requires workarounds: no floor space → seated/standing variations; no cold water → other vagal interventions. Support system quality predicts dropout risk — isolated clients need more check-ins. "No one" in support or "others are the problem" indicates relational trauma that will emerge in therapeutic relationship. Multiple constraints + no support = high-risk client needing modified protocol. Practical: Use this to pre-plan which Teachers are accessible and which need adaptation.
Describe the space where you'd do your practices.— reality-tests assumptions
Who in your life would you call at 2am if you needed to?— reveals support depth
How would your living situation respond to you making changes?— identifies sabotage risk
What time of day could be just yours, uninterrupted?— finds practice windows
If session is at their space, observe directly. Note cleanliness, organization, light, temperature. Is there a potential practice space visible?
On video, ask: "Can you show me where you'd practice?" Observe: Is there space? Light? Privacy? On phone: ask for detailed description — vagueness may indicate avoidance.
Meaning-making frameworks, spiritual resonance, and religious history
Terra Form§ works with or without spiritual framing. These questions help us understand what resonates with you. There is no wrong answer.
This determines which language resonates. Religious upbringing + current practice mismatch often indicates spiritual wound or deconversion. "Mother" concept resistance usually signals maternal wound — approach feminine/receptive framing carefully. Religious trauma requires avoiding triggering language (sin, surrender, etc.). High openness to devotional elements = can use full mystical framing. Low openness = keep it secular/scientific. Key calibration: Match language to their framework. Same practices, different containers.
What was your experience of religion growing up?— watch for affect charge
Is there anything you'd call sacred or meaningful beyond the everyday?— non-religious framing
How do you feel about the word 'mother' in a spiritual context?— screens for wound
Have you ever felt connected to something larger than yourself?— reveals capacity for numinous experience
Note any religious jewelry, symbols, or objects. Watch body language when discussing childhood religion vs current beliefs. Posture shifts reveal where the wound is.
Listen for tone shifts — intellectualization vs embodied speaking. On video, note any spiritual or religious items visible in background. Pause before pushing if resistance emerges.
Time, energy, and bandwidth available for practice
We design your protocol around what you can actually do, not what you wish you could. Be honest. Starting small is starting right.
This is the reality check — it reveals what the client can actually commit to versus what they aspire to. Over-prescription is the most common protocol failure. A client who cannot sustain the practices will abandon them and internalize failure. Match recommendations precisely to their available bandwidth, then gradually expand capacity.
On your worst days, what could you still do?— reveals floor capacity
What's happened with commitments you've made to yourself before?— predicts follow-through
What time of day do you feel most like yourself?— optimal practice window
What would make you abandon this work?— identifies dropout risks
Notice energy levels during session — are they fading? This is diagnostic of their daily capacity. Observe if they're fidgeting (need movement) or stillness-seeking.
Ask them to pull up their actual calendar and look at a typical week together. "Show me where you'd fit this" — reality testing in real-time.
Why they're here, what they're hoping for, and what they fear
The final questions. These matter most. Why are you here? What are you hoping for? What are you afraid might happen? Your honesty here shapes everything that follows.
This reveals the client's true motivation and hidden fears. Pay close attention to the "why now" — what brought them to this point matters more than abstract goals. Watch for the gap between stated intentions and underlying fears. Where they anticipate failure often indicates where the actual work lies. Clients who have "given up" often require slower, more resource-focused protocols before deeper work.
Why now? What happened that made you reach out today specifically?— reveals precipitating event
If you imagine yourself a year from now, having done this work — what's different?— future-self visioning
What part of you doesn't want to get better?— reveals secondary gain
What would you lose if you healed?— surfaces hidden resistance
Watch for tears when discussing hope or future. Note body posture when imagining change — expansion or contraction? Eyes looking up (future-oriented) or down (stuck)?
Listen for voice changes when discussing hope — does it lift or fall flat? On video, watch facial expression when imagining the future. Resignation is visible.
Your responses are private and will only be used to create your personalised protocol. We do not share your data with third parties. This information stays between us.
How they process, articulate, and share their inner world
How you communicate reveals how you process and share your inner world. Understanding your expression patterns helps us simulate how you might respond in various scenarios.
This section captures the client's communication DNA — essential for digital twin fidelity. Watch for discrepancies between preferred and actual style, which often indicates self-perception gaps. The conflict resolution pattern is particularly diagnostic for attachment style and autonomic regulation.
When something is bothering you, how do people around you know?— reveals expression style
What happens when you try to ask for what you need?— identifies blocks
Whose voice do you hear when you criticize yourself?— reveals introjected critic
What do you wish you could say that you've never been able to?— locates unexpressed material
Watch hand gestures — do they match words or contradict? Note if they cover mouth, touch throat. Observe volume regulation — too loud, too soft, monotone?
Voice analysis is primary. Note: Speed (racing vs halting), pitch (high = anxiety), volume drops (shame moments), trailing off (incomplete thoughts).
How they weigh options, tolerate uncertainty, and commit to action
How you make decisions — from small daily choices to major life directions — reveals your core operating system. This helps us understand how you weigh options and act.
Decision-making patterns are foundational for simulation accuracy. Watch for analysis paralysis combined with "gut feel" answers — this often indicates a split between intellectual and somatic knowing. Regret patterns reveal core values; what they regret not doing matters more than what they regret doing.
Tell me about a decision you're proud of. How did you make it?— reveals success pattern
When have you known something was right but couldn't act on it?— identifies knowing-acting gap
Who in your life do you trust to give you guidance?— maps trusted sources
What's a decision you're avoiding right now?— current stuck point
Watch for body involvement when discussing decisions. Gut-deciders often touch abdomen. Over-analysts show tension in forehead/jaw. Note their decision-making IN the session.
Notice response latency — instant answers vs long pauses. How do they handle your questions requiring choice? This IS data about their decision pattern.
Baseline affect, trigger patterns, and emotional recovery capacity
Your emotional patterns — what triggers you, how you recover, what you feel most often — are essential for understanding how you experience and move through the world.
This maps the client's emotional topography — baseline state, reactivity, and recovery patterns. The gap between "default emotion" and desired state indicates the therapeutic direction. Trigger patterns reveal unmetabolized material; recovery speed indicates regulatory capacity. Difficulty naming emotions (alexithymia) indicates need for bottom-up somatic approaches before cognitive work.
Default "flat/numb" + long recovery = chronic dissociation or depression requiring evaluation. Multiple triggers + minutes recovery = may overwhelm quickly in session — pace carefully. "Can't identify what I feel" = alexithymia requiring somatic focus before emotional processing. All triggers relate to one theme (rejection, control, etc.) = core wound to address.
Cross-reference: Section 4 (Nervous System) for regulation baseline, Section 16 (Defense Patterns) for emotional avoidance strategies, Section 17 (Cognitive Style) for how emotions are processed mentally.
What emotion feels most dangerous to you?— reveals forbidden affect
If your sadness could speak, what would it say?— personifies for access
When was the last time you cried? What happened?— reveals release capacity
Is there an emotion you've never let anyone see?— hidden affect
Watch microexpressions — brief flashes of emotion quickly suppressed. Note skin color changes (flushing = anger/shame, pallor = fear). Have tissues available but don't offer preemptively.
Listen for voice cracks, swallowing, sniffing. "I'm fine" in a tight voice = not fine. On video, watch eyes (pooling tears, looking away to manage affect).
Attachment style, trust patterns, and relational wounds
How you connect, what you need, where you struggle — your relational patterns shape every interaction. Understanding these helps us model your social responses.
This section maps attachment style and interpersonal needs — critical for relationship simulation. Watch for the constellation: closeness comfort + trust difficulty + help-seeking = attachment profile. The recurring patterns question reveals core relational wounds that likely originated in developmental period.
What happens in your body when someone gets too close?— reveals intimacy response
Who has hurt you most? What happened?— identifies core wounds
What would a truly safe relationship look like?— reveals longing and belief
How do you know when someone cares about you?— love language/recognition
Notice physical distance — do they lean in or away? What happens when you move closer? Attachment patterns will play out IN this relationship — observe the transference beginning.
Note how they manage session endings — easily? With difficulty? Do they keep talking past time? On video, observe camera distance — how much of themselves do they show?
Deep schema about self, world, and others that drive behavior
What you believe about yourself, others, and the world shapes every perception and choice. These deep structures guide behavior even when you're not conscious of them.
Core beliefs are the deep algorithms that run beneath conscious awareness. The self-belief question reveals foundational schema — often formed early and resistant to change. World beliefs indicate whether the client's basic orientation is toward safety or threat. The values ranking is essential for accurate behavioral prediction in the digital twin. These beliefs predict how the client will interpret ambiguous situations and respond to challenges.
"Unlovable" + "burden" = core shame requiring careful approach; high suicide risk factor. "Dangerous world" + low trust = may project threat onto practitioner; build safety slowly. Unable to identify any positive self-beliefs = severe depression or trauma; assess for suicidality. Values misaligned with lived life = source of chronic distress and self-judgment.
Cross-reference: Section 5 (History) for belief origins, Section 17 (Cognitive Style) for how beliefs maintain themselves, Section 19 (Identity) for relationship between beliefs and self-concept.
What's the worst thing you believe about yourself?— reveals core negative schema
If that belief was a person, what would they look like?— externalizes for exploration
What do you know is true about yourself that you have trouble believing?— finds positive schema
What matters most to you? What could you not live without?— core values
Watch for collapse when naming negative beliefs — physical deflation signals embodied schema. Note eye movement — looking down = shame, away = avoidance, at you = seeking validation.
Listen for voice changes when stating core beliefs — dropping volume (shame), speeding up (wanting to move past). These beliefs are often hard to say aloud — give space and silence.
Protective strategies and coping mechanisms developed for survival
We all have ways of protecting ourselves from pain. Understanding your protective strategies — without judgment — helps us work with them rather than against them.
Defenses are not pathology — they're adaptive responses to overwhelming experience. This section maps the client's protective system. The goal is not to eliminate defenses but to understand their function and help develop more flexible options. The primary defense often points to the original wound.
What do you do when you don't want to feel something?— reveals avoidance strategy
What have your defenses protected you from?— honors their function
What's the cost of staying safe this way?— reveals price of protection
If you couldn't use [primary defense], what would happen?— reveals underlying fear
Defenses are visible: crossed arms (protection), leaning back (distance), rapid talking (avoidance), going blank (dissociation). Note when defenses activate — these are diagnostic moments.
Listen for: subject changes (deflection), "I don't know" (avoidance), over-explaining (intellectualization), getting vague (fog). Name it gently: "I notice we moved away from..."
Mental patterns, thinking biases, and information processing style
How you think — your mental patterns, biases, and processing preferences — shapes how you interpret reality. This helps us understand your inner mental landscape.
Cognitive style directly impacts how information is processed and conclusions are drawn. This is essential for digital twin accuracy — the same data will yield different outputs depending on cognitive architecture. Watch for cognitive distortion patterns (catastrophizing, black-and-white thinking) which indicate areas of rigidity.
What does your inner voice sound like — kind, critical, both?— reveals self-talk tone
When something goes wrong, what's your first thought?— reveals attribution style
How do you know when you're overthinking?— tests metacognition
Can you hold two contradictory ideas at once?— cognitive flexibility
Watch forehead tension (overthinking), head tilts (considering), eyes moving side to side (processing). People who live in their heads often have less body awareness — note the head/body disconnect.
Listen for: "I think" vs "I feel" ratio, circular logic, getting lost in abstractions, difficulty arriving at a point. Ask: "What's the simplest way to say that?"
Sensory thresholds, overwhelm triggers, and soothing modalities
How you experience the world through your senses — what overwhelms you, what soothes you, what you seek out — reveals deep patterns about your nervous system and preferences.
Sensory profile is often overlooked but critical for protocol design. Highly sensitive individuals need slower, gentler approaches. Sensory-seeking clients may need more intense practices. Environmental sensitivities indicate nervous system threshold — lower threshold = more easily overwhelmed. This maps directly to recommended practice intensity.
What does "too much" feel like for you? What happens?— reveals overwhelm signature
What physical sensations soothe you?— identifies resources
Are there textures, sounds, or lights you can't tolerate?— maps sensory triggers
What does your ideal physical environment feel like?— reveals need parameters
Observe the session space — is the light okay? Temperature? Ask permission before turning on music or fans. HSP clients may be reading YOUR nervous system — regulate yourself.
Ask about their environment: "Is this a good space for you right now?" Note audio sensitivity to your voice (do they ask you to speak softer?). On video, observe lighting choices.
Self-concept stability, role identification, and authentic self access
Who you believe you are, how stable that sense is, and what roles define you — this is the foundation of your psychological architecture.
Identity coherence is foundational for digital twin fidelity. Unstable identity often indicates developmental trauma or ongoing dissociation. The gap between "who I am" and "who I appear to be" reveals the work needed. Pay attention to which identities they claim versus which they struggle with — the difficult ones often hold the most therapeutic potential.
Who are you when no one is watching?— reveals authentic self access
If you took off all your roles, what would be left?— tests for over-identification
Has your sense of who you are ever felt unstable or fragmented?— identity coherence
What parts of yourself do you hide from others?— shadow material
Watch for shifts in presentation — voice, posture, vocabulary. These may indicate parts or states. Note: Does the "presenting self" feel genuine or performed?
Listen for voice changes that suggest different states or parts. "Who is here right now?" can be a useful check-in. On video, note if they seem "different" than earlier in session.
What activates them, what depletes them, and how they sustain action
What moves you forward? What stops you? Understanding your motivational architecture helps us predict how you'll engage with challenges and opportunities.
This final section captures what activates and deactivates the client. Toward vs. away motivation is crucial for protocol framing — some clients move toward goals, others flee from pain. The procrastination pattern reveals how they relate to their own impulses and structures. Energy source (internal vs. external) indicates sustainability of motivation.
What lights you up? When do you feel most alive?— reveals intrinsic motivation
What's the difference between what you want to do and what you actually do?— maps intention-action gap
When you procrastinate, what are you really avoiding?— reveals underlying fear
What would you do if you weren't afraid?— unlocks blocked desire
Notice how they prepare to leave — relief? Reluctance? Take a moment to resource them before they go into the world. Offer a transition: "What do you need before you leave?"
Leave time for transition. Ask: "How are you feeling as we wrap up?" Ensure they're not immediately going into high-demand situations. Schedule next contact before ending.
You have completed the full intake. Your responses paint a comprehensive picture that will inform your personalized protocol and, if you choose, enable testing of ideas against your digital profile. This information remains private and secure.
Thank you for your honesty. What you have shared here took courage. Many of these questions name what has gone unnamed for years.
You have taken the first step. Not the step of understanding — the step of being seen. The body does not need to be fixed. It needs to complete what got interrupted. The ground is ready. The Teachers are waiting. And they are patient.
Download your responses below. These form the foundation of your protocol.
Choose how you'd like to save your intake responses. You can download at any time — even with incomplete sections.
Beautiful formatted HTML — open in browser and print to PDF
Simple text format for notes and records
Structured data for importing elsewhere